According to scientist, author and journalist Matt Ridley in
'The Rational Optimist', hominid societies such as Homo Erectus made excellent, functional hand axes from flint. They, and similar pre-human societies did this for the best part of a million years, but without ever improving the design or moving on to a new and better technology. Then Homo Sapiens (that's us!) came along, and before you knew it we were making bows, arrows, ploughs, fishing hooks, nets, bricks, wheels, pots, cloth, beads and canoes. That process has continued apace until today we have cellophane, cell phones and stem cell therapy. Ridley argues that a key driver of cultural and technological innovation since hunter gatherer times has been trade. His erudite and detailed proposition can be (rather simplistically - sorry Matt!) distilled into the following points:
1) When a human population gets big enough - or achieves a numerical critical mass - then its members can begin to specialise. Instead of everybody pitching in with the hunting and the gathering (as was the case with Homo Erectus and the Neanderthals), some can concentrate on weaving, others on fishing, some on spearmaking, others on farming and so on.
2) We are the only advanced apes that instinctively barters goods and services - i.e swopping one thing for another, dissimilar thing. Although chimpanzees have been known to exchange food for other food stuffs, or reciprocally groom each other, true barter is different. It must entail someone being prepared to swop wheat for beads, or dye for leather.
3) This talent for barter, plus the inclination to specialise, meant that when 'Oz' decided to focus on making fish hooks from reindeer bone (and so became really good at it) and 'Ug' decided to concentrate on the fishing - thus increasing his skill, and then both decided to trade these skills....Well then both Oz and Ug benefited out of all proportion to the efforts they made. This was a classic 'win - win' scenario.
4) Further, as our ancestors spread out from Africa and across Asia into what is now Australasia and so on, they came into contact with other tribes and races who had developed their own technologies. These were traded, people learned new things and further innovations were made.
5) Eventually, you went out and bought an Iphone.
Now as I was reading this I was minded of something else I had read about how, pound for pound, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has more Nobel Prizes for Science than any other institution on the planet. Even heavy weights like Cambridge University pale in comparison. And (so the argument goes), this isn't because the staff and students are significantly brighter than those from Cambridge, Caltech or Lausanne's Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale, but because they operate in an environment which is more conducive to information exchange. Simply put, while the Dons and PHD students at Cambridge toil away in the physical silos created by separate colleges along the banks of the Cam, their peers at MIT enjoy an architectural infrastructure which is to a greater degree integrated and has more food courts, sports areas, shared recreational facilities and pedestrian corridors beween faculties and departments where at any given time, you are more likely to bump into someone who has just had a great idea!
'Very interesting' you may say - 'but what has this got to do with my situation'? Well, firstly, to be human is to be an innovator. Innovation is the norm. Not to innovate is the weird thing. Secondly, your organisations' skills and expertise represent a high degree of specialisation. As an innovator with a specialism you should be able to find ways to leverage your skills to find solutions, but only if you meet with, communicate with and share with enough people. So, in these challenging times, we all have to get off our lardies and seek out other interesting people to talk to, swop ideas with and trade information, skills, talents, opinions. We must dissect challenges in partnership with others. We must be hungry to collaborate and work with others.
Simply put, in order to find better solutions to apparently intractable problems we must:
1) Believe that the solution is out there.
2) Get into serious networking. Go to where there are lots of people (the Chamber of Commerce, your local branch of the Institute of Fundraising, conferences, talks, competitor AGMs - whatever).
3) Talk to lots and lots of people with intent to find a collaborator. Spread your business cards like confetti. Look for complementary skills (or at least enthusiasm!).
4) Decide on your perfect partner agency and work out what you can offer them and what you want in exchange. Make the approach (see '2', above).
And if the challenge of bigger targets, more pressure and less money has caused you to begin to lose hope and to retreat into your own 'silo', just remember that the next person you are talking to (be they funder, customer, stakeholder or competitor) could be walking around with a hand axe in their back pocket which is better than yours. And that they would almost certainly be prepared to share it with you if you offer the right thing in return ....
Mark Butcher
Labels
- Creativity and Innovation (3)
- Fundraising (1)
- Hello (1)
- Managing Others (2)
- Marketing (1)
- Personal Effectiveness (2)
Wednesday, 11 September 2013
Tuesday, 26 February 2013
3 techniques to transform your personal effectiveness (or ‘ways to avoid the runaway train’)
Let's be clear from the start - good time management is not about being able to work faster, harder or more efficiently. In fact, it is just the opposite. The best time managers find that they operate in calmer environments, they have more free time and they often do NOT finish their 'to-do' lists. Here are three powerful techniques used by the best time managers ...
1) FOCUS ON RESULTS: Instead of being obsessed with getting your 'to-do' list finished - become focused instead on getting better results. The Pareto Principle suggests that about 20% of what we do will deliver around 80% of the key results we need, This means of course that the other 80% of what we do (or so) is relatively worthless! Ever lost the will to live in a meeting? Ever wondered what happens to the report you've slaved over (did anything actually change as a result)? When these things happen, you are probably involved in an activity that is not delivering value against your job purpose. The trick of good time management is to recognise which activities deliver real value - and which do not. Effective time managers can tell the difference - and ruthlessly avoid work that does not deliver. They work hard, but avoid all unnecessary work.
2) TAKE A BREAK: One
implication of the Pareto Principle is that you should never take work home or
work beyond the normal close of your regular office hours. You should never
work in the evening or at weekends. ‘Impossible!’ you cry. ‘If I didn’t put in
all of these extra hours, I’d never be able to cope’. And of course it does
seem that way. However, the Pareto Principle is quite clear on this. You will
do your best work in the 20% or so of your time when you are fresh, alert, and
focused. For the rest of the day, you will get a diminishing scale of returns
as you become more tired. Trying to finish work over the weekend simply means
that you will be less effective on Monday morning, because you have not spent
the time relaxing, recharging and refreshing yourself. Taking work home in the
evening simply means that you will be tired tomorrow. And that means you’ll be
less effective, make more mistakes and work more slowly. So you’ll end up
taking work home again. And so on
and so forth. To break this cycle, simply stop. By using your spare time to
recover from the challenges of a busy life; by recharging your batteries
properly, you will find that you get more from your day. This simple reality,
combined with the other techniques in this book designed to make you more
effective will mean that burning the midnight oil becomes a thing of the past.
Use your time to work on your goals and personal projects and
your employer will see a marked improvement in the thing they pay you to
produce - quality.
3) TAKE ACTION: If
you are twenty years old tomorrow, you may look forward, all things being
equal, to another sixty years of life. So there’s loads of time to achieve
everything you want, right? Hang on.
Sixty years sounds like an age. But ask any thirty year old how quick
the ten years pass between twenty and thirty and they are likely to answer -
‘in a twinkling’. Ask a forty year old and they will tell you that time
accelerates as you get older (Einstein missed that one). And anyway, it’s not
actually sixty years you’ve got left. You can take off 33% of that for
sleeping; about another 10% each for watching the telly and eating and 5% for
grooming, sitting on the loo and bathing. I’m not even going to begin to
calculate how much time you will waste waiting for colleagues to turn up late
for meetings, trains to arrive and your children to tidy up after themselves.
Actually I do know the answer to the last one - it’s forever. The future is
travelling towards you at 3,600 second per hour. There’s less time left than
you think! So stop thinking about
it! Do it!
Here are just a few ways to avoid procrastination.
BANJO
Technique: This acronym stands for Bang A Nasty Job Off. The idea is that when you
arrive at work with an unpleasant task hanging over your head, you have a
simple choice. Let it lie and get on with other stuff - in which case it will
gnaw at the back of your mind. Or do it first. In which case you get it done,
out of the way and you get to feel the relief that this brings. If you use the
BANJO method, even the most unpleasant days just get better and better as they
go on.
Cold Plunge: A whole range
of work challenges, from difficult conversations with colleagues to the
production of the annual report are sometimes best tackled just by diving in.
Putting it off while still worrying about it can simply serve to blow the whole
thing out of proportion.
Anticipation of the unpleasantness can be far worse than the real thing.
So dive right in - more times than not you’ll find it’s not as bad as you
think.
Avoid deactivation
words and phrases: These are words and phrases which allow you to put off
taking action, and include ‘tomorrow’, ‘later’, ‘next week’, ‘when I’m ready’,
‘some other time’. More often than not they really mean ‘never’. If it really
needs doing, do it now!
Take action: We can plan,
think, ponder, reflect and learn until the cows come home - but unless it is
followed up with action, nothing will change. This ability to take daily
action, and to persevere is recognised as an important attribute in the search
for success by even the most brilliant minds. Thomas Edison undertook more than
50,000 experiments to perfect the storage cell battery. He is reputed to have
argued that none of the failed experiments were really failures, because each
one brought him a step closer to finding the correct solution!
Get the habit:
Taking action is a habit. It is a frame of mind. The more actions you
take, the more likely you are to take successful action. Get into the habit
now. Think about something you plan to do but haven’t done yet. Put down this article,
and take that action, now!
In summary – focus on results not activities; look after yourself and
keep your batteries charged; and get stuck in! Remember the words of Will Rogers: ‘Even if you're on the right track, you'll get run over if you just
sit there.’
Thursday, 31 January 2013
Spot the Psycho!
-->
Do you have a psychopath in your midst? Forget dressing up in old
lady’s clothing and hanging around shower cubicles - the office psychopath is
not necessarily a danger to your life or limb. However, the selfish,
manipulative, intimidating and calculating behaviour demonstrated by those who
exhibit antisocial personality disorder can be severely injurious to staff
morale, mental well-being and productivity.
And it is more common than you might think. Studies suggest that
between 1% and 3% of the population have this disorder. That means at least
some of you will either have one in your team at the moment, or will have at
some point in the future.
The office ‘psycho’ will be driven entirely by self-interest
with an inability to be
moved by the negative implications of their actions for others.
Specifically they might display a lack of conscience, little empathy,
questionable loyalty, whilst breezing about in an enviably guilt free
environment. Worse, their dissembling and charm can make it difficult to spot
them until they are well established. Short of investing in a padded cell, a straitjacket
and a variety of sedative narcotics (try getting those budget items past the trustees!) what can you do?
How to spot
the ‘psycho’ in your team and what to do about it
Frankly, short of going back to school to retrain as a
psychiatrist and buying a
white coat, your options are limited - but working on the basis
that forearmed is forewarned - we’d suggest the following…
First, learn to recognise psychopathic behaviour. What does it
look like? Well,
people who lose their temper inexplicably, lie and manipulate, nip
to the gym and claim to have been at an important meeting or take credit for
others’ work may be in the one percent! Of course they may just be jerks - but
that’s another subject for another day!
Psychopaths fall into four
types:
A. ANGRY SHOUTY MAN, Typically male, this personality type is
likely to fly into frequent rages with little or no provocation.
B. CHARM SCHOOL GRADUATE, This type is likely to employ great
charm and persuasiveness as they manipulate and lie.
C. COLD FISH, Distant and cold, don’t feel genuine emotions,
unresponsive to punishment. If their antisocial behaviour is checked, it is by
self interest rather than concern for the consequences to others.
D. ROLLER COASTER RIDER, Stress addicts who can demonstrate high
levels of anxiety. Compulsive risk takers who can’t resist big risks.
Key behaviours
Look out for the following behaviour sets - it might mean that you
are dealing with a psychopath.
v They are ‘know it alls’, never wrong, seeming expert on whatever
is being
discussed.
v They are often superficial, charming, glib and amusing.
v They may paint themselves as heroes of tall tales and anecdotes.
v They may be arrogant, superior, domineering braggarts.
v There is one rule for them and another for everyone else.
v They lie often and are unconcerned when a lie is detected
v They don’t care about the consequences of their actions for
other people, but are very concerned for any negative impacts on themselves.
v They are cold, detached, untouched by the problems of others.
We should stress that you should look out for multiple and
repeated instances of the above behaviours before you even begin to suspect
that you are dealing with one of ‘the three percent’.
What should you do - tactics
for survival:
It is hard to deal with people such as those described above, but
here are a few tips.
1. Always take up references, and if in doubt, probe the referee to get to the
truth.
2. Don’t attempt to reason with your suspected psycho - they are not reasonable.
3. Establish a power base, and use it. Build alliances with other
powerful people in the organisation.
4. Do not say ‘you are a psycho - I’ve read all about people like
you’. This will cut no ice with them if they are a psychopath - and leave you
open to disciplinary action if they are not!
5. Do establish clear rules to govern their behaviour and put in
place an
appropriate, gradually escalating series of negative consequences.
Be consistent and strong.
6. Seek support from others. Why should this be just your problem?
P.S. It
could be you! Remember to include yourself in the ‘how to spot a psycho’ audit.
If so, I’m not going to try to reason with you - but I would suggest that your
undoubted intelligence should tell you that your self-interest would be best
served in the long term by being nice to other people!
Wednesday, 30 January 2013
Managing Inadequate Performance
As a
supervisor it is your job to improve performance – but sometimes the message
doesn’t seem to get through. When an employee is repeatedly late, or delivers work
of a sub standard nature – try the following programme:
Define and communicate what acceptable performance is
You have more experience than the person
you are supervising. Spell out to them
what your expectations are. Give concrete examples and avoid general exhortations to ‘do better’ or ‘improve performance’.
what your expectations are. Give concrete examples and avoid general exhortations to ‘do better’ or ‘improve performance’.
Switch on your 'below par' radar
Manage by walking around. Ask people about their work.
When you spot something that is not good enough, bring it up as soon as
possible.
It is difficult to confront inadequate performance.
So try this sequence:
1) Confront the worker privately – not in front of others. A defensive response is
much less likely.
1) Confront the worker privately – not in front of others. A defensive response is
much less likely.
2) Manage
your own emotions. Don’t choose a time when you are
annoyed or angry.
Wait until you feel calmer.
3) Take ‘you are wrong’ out of the equation. Discussion need not be a dressing down
or an argument. It should be a problem solving session where two rationale
individuals try to improve the situation. Approach the session with this firmly in
mind.
4) Do not get involved in small talk. Get to the point quickly. This is a time to be
businesslike.
5) Do not apologise. You shouldn’t say things like ‘I’m sorry to have to mention this
but’. Just say that you have noticed something and you need to find a way for this
to change.
6) Look for underlying factors. There may be a very good reason why the employee
is under performing. Don’t make assumptions.
7) Try to offer the resources the employee needs. Is the underperformance caused
by a lack of proper tools to get the job done, not enough time, physical ailments,
stress, family problems, or simply a talented employee in an under demanding role.
Wait until you feel calmer.
3) Take ‘you are wrong’ out of the equation. Discussion need not be a dressing down
or an argument. It should be a problem solving session where two rationale
individuals try to improve the situation. Approach the session with this firmly in
mind.
4) Do not get involved in small talk. Get to the point quickly. This is a time to be
businesslike.
5) Do not apologise. You shouldn’t say things like ‘I’m sorry to have to mention this
but’. Just say that you have noticed something and you need to find a way for this
to change.
6) Look for underlying factors. There may be a very good reason why the employee
is under performing. Don’t make assumptions.
7) Try to offer the resources the employee needs. Is the underperformance caused
by a lack of proper tools to get the job done, not enough time, physical ailments,
stress, family problems, or simply a talented employee in an under demanding role.
Set improvement goals
Explicitly state the level of performance required. Make them SMART.
Explicitly state the level of performance required. Make them SMART.
Establish an action plan
People may not change unless you keep the pressure on. So produce an action plan which considers:
* Closer supervision
* Job reassignment
* Additional training
* Mentoring
* More stimulating work
* Lower performance standards until an ‘upskilling’ has taken place
* Whatever else seems appropriate
* Job reassignment
* Additional training
* Mentoring
* More stimulating work
* Lower performance standards until an ‘upskilling’ has taken place
* Whatever else seems appropriate
Labels:
Managing Others
Location:
Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, UK
Tuesday, 22 January 2013
Assertiveness At Work
There are several models that describe assertiveness and how to develop it, but
amongst the best thinking comes from Ken and Kate Back, who've specialised in this
area of human behaviour for over 20 years. In their book "Assertiveness at Work - a
practical guide to handling awkward situations", they describe what assertiveness is, and
how to develop it. Their concepts are simple and make sense, and have helped many
people to become more effective in their dealings with others.
DEFINING ASSERTIVENESS
Assertiveness lies in the middle of a continuum of behaviour towards others, that
the Backs defined in terms of how we recognise the rights of the two parties involved.
Aggressive: You exert your right to have ideas and opinions at the expense of the
other person's rights. In fact you behave as if the other person's rights
don't matter.
Assertive: You exert your rights freely and clearly, but at the same recognise the
other person's rights to be heard, to have pride in what they do, etc.
Non-Assertive: You take too much account of the other person's rights, to the extent
that you forego some or all of your rights to express ideas or influence events.
To illustrate the three types of behaviour, they quote a simple example of a
manager spotting some minor errors in the written work of a subordinate. The manager
goes to the individual and says:
Aggressive
"I don't know how you've got the nerve to give me this sort of stuff
for signing. It's full of mistakes."
Assertive
"Jane, I'd like you to re-do this document as there are several mistakes
in it."
Non-Assertive
"I know it's, er .... probably my fault in .... not writing very clearly, but
is there, um .... any chance at all you could find a spare minute to um
.... just change one of two small things on this letter for me?"
Or you find an excuse not to take the document back at all…
Clearly the desired behaviour is to be assertive, and the book goes on to describe
in detail how you can develop assertiveness in a range of situations. To frame that
development, they put forward the idea of Inner Dialogues: those conversations we have
with ourselves before we interact with someone else. Sometimes these Inner Dialogues
are subconscious, but if you become more aware of them, you can manage them and
become more effective in your dealings with others.
To go back to the example above, the inner dialogues might be:
Aggressive
"If people produce rubbish, I have every right to tell them so"
"She obviously doesn't care. That's typical of young people today."
"This reflects badly on me, and I won't stand for it."
Assertive
"This may be uncomfortable for us both, but we can handle it."
"She has the right to make mistakes, but also the responsibility to
correct them."
"I want her to know the effect her errors have on other people."
Non-Assertive
"I don't want to make a scene or upset our working relationship."
"I'm sure these are unintentional errors - I'll let it go this time."
"I know she's very busy, so I expect that's why these mistakes
happened."
By having your Inner Dialogue before you deal with the other person, you can
adjust your behaviour to be Assertive. You achieve this by turning your Faulty Inner
Dialogue (aggressive or non-assertive) into a Sound Inner Dialogue (assertive).
There's something for all of us in this model - it isn't just for tyrannical bosses or shrinking
wall-flowers! Effective assertive behaviour is an important building block for creating a
empowered, involving, learning organisation culture. You would do well to develop your
assertiveness before embarking on grander culture changes.
Many training organisations incorporate this thinking into their training courses on
Assertiveness or Personal Effectiveness, but if you want to understand Assertiveness
properly, Ken and Kate Back's original book is a great place to start.
amongst the best thinking comes from Ken and Kate Back, who've specialised in this
area of human behaviour for over 20 years. In their book "Assertiveness at Work - a
practical guide to handling awkward situations", they describe what assertiveness is, and
how to develop it. Their concepts are simple and make sense, and have helped many
people to become more effective in their dealings with others.
DEFINING ASSERTIVENESS
Assertiveness lies in the middle of a continuum of behaviour towards others, that
the Backs defined in terms of how we recognise the rights of the two parties involved.
Aggressive: You exert your right to have ideas and opinions at the expense of the
other person's rights. In fact you behave as if the other person's rights
don't matter.
Assertive: You exert your rights freely and clearly, but at the same recognise the
other person's rights to be heard, to have pride in what they do, etc.
Non-Assertive: You take too much account of the other person's rights, to the extent
that you forego some or all of your rights to express ideas or influence events.
To illustrate the three types of behaviour, they quote a simple example of a
manager spotting some minor errors in the written work of a subordinate. The manager
goes to the individual and says:
Aggressive
"I don't know how you've got the nerve to give me this sort of stuff
for signing. It's full of mistakes."
Assertive
"Jane, I'd like you to re-do this document as there are several mistakes
in it."
Non-Assertive
"I know it's, er .... probably my fault in .... not writing very clearly, but
is there, um .... any chance at all you could find a spare minute to um
.... just change one of two small things on this letter for me?"
Or you find an excuse not to take the document back at all…
Clearly the desired behaviour is to be assertive, and the book goes on to describe
in detail how you can develop assertiveness in a range of situations. To frame that
development, they put forward the idea of Inner Dialogues: those conversations we have
with ourselves before we interact with someone else. Sometimes these Inner Dialogues
are subconscious, but if you become more aware of them, you can manage them and
become more effective in your dealings with others.
To go back to the example above, the inner dialogues might be:
Aggressive
"If people produce rubbish, I have every right to tell them so"
"She obviously doesn't care. That's typical of young people today."
"This reflects badly on me, and I won't stand for it."
Assertive
"This may be uncomfortable for us both, but we can handle it."
"She has the right to make mistakes, but also the responsibility to
correct them."
"I want her to know the effect her errors have on other people."
Non-Assertive
"I don't want to make a scene or upset our working relationship."
"I'm sure these are unintentional errors - I'll let it go this time."
"I know she's very busy, so I expect that's why these mistakes
happened."
By having your Inner Dialogue before you deal with the other person, you can
adjust your behaviour to be Assertive. You achieve this by turning your Faulty Inner
Dialogue (aggressive or non-assertive) into a Sound Inner Dialogue (assertive).
There's something for all of us in this model - it isn't just for tyrannical bosses or shrinking
wall-flowers! Effective assertive behaviour is an important building block for creating a
empowered, involving, learning organisation culture. You would do well to develop your
assertiveness before embarking on grander culture changes.
Many training organisations incorporate this thinking into their training courses on
Assertiveness or Personal Effectiveness, but if you want to understand Assertiveness
properly, Ken and Kate Back's original book is a great place to start.
Sunday, 20 January 2013
Three cornerstones of creative thinking
Dr. Teresa Amabile, Professor of Business Administration at
Harvard Business School describes the “Three Components of Creativity‟. Writing in the Harvard
Business Review, she considers how, expertise, creative thinking skills and
motivation are all required if creativity is to take place within structured
organisations.
Component 1: Expertise
Expertise, in her model, is not just
that connected to a person’s current post or
job. It also refers to all of the knowledge and experience that
that person has gained in life. So a Chief Executive may also bring skills
garnered from being a mother, a youth leader, or a hockey player.
Component 2: Creative Thinking
Amabile includes a number of elements in her description of creative
thinking. For example she cites a ‘capacity to put existing ideas in new combinations’, ‘perseverance’, ‘the capacity for incubation’ and the combination of ‘knowledge from seemingly disparate fields’.
Component 3: Motivation
Motivation is the fuel that drives the
vehicle provided by the two elements listed
above. All the expertise and ability to think creatively in the
world will be useless, if the person is not motivated to put them to good use. In most organisations, there is a
wealth of talent, both visible and hidden among the staff and volunteers. The
ability to think creatively can be learned or encouraged by reading books or blogs, or attending training courses. But nurturing a positive motivation to
be creative among its people is the one element that most organizations leave
out. And a car without fuel is going nowhere.
How to motivate creativity
There are three things a manager can do to build individual
motivation to solve
problems.
1. Match people with the right
task. If you play to people’s strengths you may
find that they begin to enjoy the challenge. It seems obvious, but
when we want to deliver a presentation, how many times do we see the person
with the strongest dread of presenting being chosen? If a piece has to be
written for the community newsletter, do we choose the best communicator, or
simply the person who is closest to the task, to prepare the copy? If we do not
put conscious effort into the matching process, then mismatches are inevitable.
And then of course, we will have people who are not enthusiastic and engaged,
far less passionate, about their task.
2. Give people freedom to act. A manager may give team
members a clear brief, or target. But if the manager then constrains their freedom
to act in order to retain control over how something is to be achieved, then
they will limit the team’s ability to provide creative solutions. So delegate
responsibility for the results, as well as the task in hand. Ask people to
solve the problem or to come back to you with alternative solutions, but not
with problems. Hand over ownership of the problem. Light the blue touch paper of
your peoples‟ creativity and then stand back.
3. Give people time: People need time to be
creative. They need strategic time.
In other words a long period of time in which to consider,
gestate, ponder and wait for their subconscious brain or intuition to kick in.
You don’t necessarily
get creativity by demanding results yesterday. They also need tactical time.
This is time knitted into the fabric of a day to brainstorm or dream. So create
a long enough timeline, but also encourage people to schedule in quite time
into their daily schedules. Encourage them to clear their decks of urgent but
not necessarily important tasks and “have a meeting with their creativity‟.
Monday, 14 January 2013
The past, present and future of corporate philanthropy
-->
Background
Business
investment in the community is not a new phenomenon. In the nineteenth century
William Hesketh Lever raised money for a lifeboat - ‘Sunlight No. 1’. This was
gifted to the RNLI after the money to pay for it was raised as part of a
Sunlight Soap competition in 1887. Leaders from the fields of commerce and
industry, such as the Cadbury and Rowntree families also pioneered business
giving. In the USA Andrew Carnegie set about giving away his vast fortune to
endow civic buildings, libraries and museums. Even then there was a mix of motivation. As Tony Elischer
tells us in ‘Corporate Fundraising’ (CAF/ICFM - Ed Valerie Morton) ‘Even in
these early times, the motivation behind company support was complex and
sophisticated, ranging from the purely philanthropic, through ambitious desire
for self promotion and social aggrandisement, to recognition of mutually
commercial self interest.” This range of motivation still exists today. Indeed
it, and the techniques employed to achieve it have increased in sophistication,
breadth and scope.
How does corporate funding work?
In ‘Cause
Related Marketing’ (Butterworth Heineman 1999) Sue Adkins describes
a ‘continuum’ with ‘philanthropy’ at one end and ‘business basics’
at the other. In the ultra competitive world of the business person, it is
easier to justify spending money on those relationships with community
groups that are at the 'business end' of the spectrum - in other words that deliver some sort of business benefit. Author Sue Adkins describes Cause Related Marketing as ‘ a
commercial activity by which businesses and charities or causes form a
partnership with each other to market an image, product or service for mutual
benefit’.
Specifically, what
can businesses offer you?
Businesses
can support you in a number of ways:
· with
cash: Depending on the nature of the relationship, the sums can
be very small or very large.
· with
expertise: When a small dyslexia charity needed a new brochure, it was printed and
designed free of charge by a local printer.
· with
people: When the Gateshead Hilton experienced an unexpected delay in opening in
2003, the company were left with around 50 employees, already under contract,
but with nothing to do. They asked Gateshead Council if they could use any
people on a temporary basis to accomplish specific goals. Similarly, the City
Centre Manager of Newcastle City Council was, in the late 90’s, a seconded
employee of Barclays Bank.
Cash or ‘in kind’
Most of the resource that companies put into the community is not in the form
of cash
at all. The Directory of Social Change recently calculated the balance between
cash donation and other forms of ‘community contribution’ (goods, services,
etc) and found this to be the case with regard to almost every major corporate donor.
What do they want from you?
In a ‘Business
in the Community’ Corporate Survey, Chief Exec’s, Marketing and Community
Affairs Directors were asked what they thought could be achieved by a relationship
with community organisations. The results were:
Enhance
reputation: 75%
Motivate
employees: 54%
Achieve
good PR: 51%
Brand
awareness: 44%
Develop
loyalty: 39%
Increase
sales: 34%
Deflect
bad PR: 14%
Trial
product/service: 6%
So if
your pitch puts the emphasis on ‘enhancing reputation’ or ‘motivating employees’
then they are already likely to believe you can deliver!
Your offer may be motivational: Especially at a time of recession, companies are interested in joint promotions or fun events involving their staff.
Your value may be delivered by association:
A relationship with a local organisation can demonstrate to a variety
of stakeholders - from local authorities, to customers to staff, that a
business is committed to a specific community.
You may allow access to key groups: Companies may be interested in reaching out
to the people you can reach. For example when a local supermarket launched an Asian Food line, it supported the Leicester Mela.
What if
you have no ‘features’ to offer
It is
still possible to build a relationship with a business and get them to support
you. One way to do this is to help them build a relationship with someone else...
Many
charities offer ‘corporate clubs’. Companies join and are afforded various
benefits. Often they don’t really care a lot about what the organising charity
does - but they like to be in the club because it helps them build other
valuable business relationships.
For
example the Royal Shakespeare Company raised money for its Globe Theatre in
London by
allowing sponsors to join their corporate club. The club had a number of
different levels, with increasing benefits, dependent on the size of the member’s
contribution. The five status levels were:
1) The
Lord Chamberlain’s Men
2)
Master of the Revels
3)
Countess of Pembroke’s Circle
4) The
Patrons
5) The
Nobles
Barrow
in Furness Council has set up an Arts Club to raise money from local businesses
for its Leisure Department. The list below shows the three levels with examples
of the kinds of company who have joined:
1) Level
Member example Membership Cost
2) Gold
British Gas £3,000
3) Silver
Kimberley Clark £2,000
4) Bronze
Furness Plastics £1,000
In 1997
this raised around £65,000 of ‘free’ income to be spent on arts activities. In
return for their money, member organisations were invited to a black tie
dinner. Gold members got a better seat and preferential treatment over Silver -
who in turn got a slightly better deal than the Bronze members.
So what of the future?
It might seem logical that businesses will withdraw from community involvement when times are hard. But in fact the opposite may be true. As companies find that they need to become more competitive, one way they can do this is through the added value that Corporate Social Responsibility offers. A tough economic environment means that they have problems - and you may be able to help them solve those problems - the simplest example being by helping to motivate staff with team building challenges, fundraising events and so on.
What should your proposal look like?
It of course depends on the company - and who you represent. But if there are constant, unchanging principles, they are these:
1. Start small - Take your time building the relationship - no one gets married after a first date!
2. Go in 'warm' (if you can) rather than 'cold'. In other words use contacts to find clients, customers or suppliers of the business to introduce you.
3. Find out what they are most likley to want from the relationship. Motivated staff is a good place to start.
4. Focus on companies with which you share some territory (the same neighbourhood, the same customers, the same issues, similar values, etc)
5. Don't ask for money - find creative ways to use their muscle, expertise, contacts or skills to save you money or deliver services and outcomes that you would otherwise have to pay for.
Keep Smiling!
Mark
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)